Saul, Føllesdal, & Ulfstein: The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond

https://www.dipublico.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/saul.jpg

Saul, Føllesdal, & Ulfstein: The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond

Matthew Saul (Universitetet i Oslo – PluriCourts), Andreas Føllesdal (Universitetet i Oslo – Law), & Geir Ulfstein (Universitetet i Oslo – Law) have published The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:

• Matthew Saul, Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein, Introduction


• Geir Ulfstein, A transnational separation of powers?


• Kirsten Roberts Lyer & Philippa Webb, Effective parliamentary oversight of human rights


• Jürg Steiner, Citizens’ deliberation and human rights


• Alice Donald, Parliaments as compliance partners in the European convention on human rights system


• Theresa Squatrito, Parliamentary interpretation and application of European human rights law


• Matthew Saul, How and when can the international human rights judiciary promote the human rights role of national parliaments?


• Amrei Müller, Obligations to ‘secure’ the rights of the Convention in an ‘effective political democracy’: how should parliaments and domestic courts interact?


• Colin Murray, Shifting emergencies from the political to the legal sphere: placing the United Kingdom’s derogations from the ECHR in historical context


• Nino Tsereteli, The role of the European Court of Human Rights in facilitating legislative change in cases of long-term delays in implementation


• Leiv Marsteintredet, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the mobilisation of parliaments


• Ed Bates, Democratic override (or rejection) and the authority of the Strasbourg court – the UK parliament and prisoner voting


• Colm O’Cinneide, Saying ‘no’ to Strasbourg – when are national parliaments justified in refusing to give effect to judgments of international human rights courts?


• Andreas Føllesdal, Law making by law breaking? A theory of parliamentary civil disobedience against international human rights courts


• Matthew Saul, Conclusion: how does, could, and should the international human rights judiciary interact with national parliaments?

[via International Law Reporter]

Saul, Føllesdal, & Ulfstein: The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and BeyondDerecho Internacional Público - www.dipublico.org