Smet & Brems: When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights

https://www.dipublico.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/smet.jpg

Smet & Brems: When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights

Stijn Smet (Univ. of Melbourne – Law) & Eva Brems (Ghent Univ. – Law) have published When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights: Conflict or Harmony? (Oxford Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:

• Stijn Smet, Introduction – Conflicts of Rights in Theoretical and Comparative Perspective


• Samantha Besson, Human Rights in Relation – A Critical Reading of the ECtHR’s Approach to Conflicts of Rights


• Stijn Smet, Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR: Towards a Structured Balancing Test


• Sébastien Van Drooghenbroeck, Conflict and Consent: Does the Theory of Waiver of Fundamental Rights Offer Solutions to Settle Their Conflicts?


• Eva Brems, Evans v UK: Three Grounds for Ruling Differently


• Lorenzo Zucca, The Comedy of Mrs Evans


• Dolores Morondo Taramundi, To Discriminate in order to Fight Discrimination: Paradox or Abuse?


• Russell Sandberg, The Future of Religious Freedom


• Dirk Voorhoof, Freedom of Expression versus Privacy and the Right to Reputation


• Leto Cariolou, Circumnavigating the Conflict Between the Right to Reputation and the Right to Freedom of Expression


• Javier Martínez-Torrón, Fernández Martínez v Spain: An Unclear Intersection of Rights


• Ian Leigh, Reversibility, Proportionality, and Conflicting Rights: Fernández Martínez v Spain


• Eva Brems, Conclusion – Conflicting Views on Conflicting Rights

[via International Law Reporter]

Smet & Brems: When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human RightsDerecho Internacional Público - www.dipublico.org